<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Trouble With Sharding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simonmunro.com/2009/09/10/the-trouble-with-sharding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simonmunro.com/2009/09/10/the-trouble-with-sharding/</link>
	<description>Enterprise, Cloud and Windows Azure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 04:05:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paco Cuevas</title>
		<link>http://simonmunro.com/2009/09/10/the-trouble-with-sharding/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Paco Cuevas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 04:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonmunro.wordpress.com/2009/09/10/the-trouble-with-sharding/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Great analisys Simon!, i hope SQL Azure futures take care of those huge and high performace architectures more than to increase the size of database 5GB, 10GB, 50GB(by request)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great analisys Simon!, i hope SQL Azure futures take care of those huge and high performace architectures more than to increase the size of database 5GB, 10GB, 50GB(by request)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motorbikes and the SQLness of SQL &#171; Simon Munro</title>
		<link>http://simonmunro.com/2009/09/10/the-trouble-with-sharding/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Motorbikes and the SQLness of SQL &#171; Simon Munro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonmunro.wordpress.com/2009/09/10/the-trouble-with-sharding/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>[...] to get around the scale out problems of SQL and with SQL Azure in particular, discussions around a sharding approach for data.&#160; Some of my colleagues were actively discussing this and it led me to weigh [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to get around the scale out problems of SQL and with SQL Azure in particular, discussions around a sharding approach for data.&#160; Some of my colleagues were actively discussing this and it led me to weigh [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Jennings</title>
		<link>http://simonmunro.com/2009/09/10/the-trouble-with-sharding/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Jennings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonmunro.wordpress.com/2009/09/10/the-trouble-with-sharding/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a demand for sharding recommendations, patterns and practices on my part. 

See http://oakleafblog.blogspot.com/2009/09/windows-azure-and-cloud-computing-posts_09.html#SDS

--rj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a demand for sharding recommendations, patterns and practices on my part. </p>
<p>See <a href="http://oakleafblog.blogspot.com/2009/09/windows-azure-and-cloud-computing-posts_09.html#SDS" rel="nofollow">http://oakleafblog.blogspot.com/2009/09/windows-azure-and-cloud-computing-posts_09.html#SDS</a></p>
<p>&#8211;rj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
